Skip to content
RED SAGSkills
mediumPrompt Engineer interview question

How would you build an evaluation set for a prompt that writes replies to customer complaints?

What the interviewer wants to hear

  • Sample real complaints across types, channels and difficulty
  • Include edge cases: angry, vague, multilingual, abusive, out of scope
  • Define pass criteria or rubric with domain experts
  • Choose grading: human, LLM judge, simple checks
  • Keep a held-out portion and update over time

Model answer

I would start with real complaints, with personal data removed, sampled across categories like delivery, refunds and product quality, and across channels and lengths. Then I add edge cases on purpose: very angry customers, vague messages, mixed languages such as Hinglish, abusive text, and requests outside policy. With the support team, I define what a good reply looks like as a rubric: correct policy, empathy, clear next step, right tone, no false promises. Some checks can be automatic, like length or whether a refund amount matches policy; others need an LLM judge calibrated against human scores, plus regular human review. I tag each example by category so I can see where a prompt is weak. I keep part of the set held out to avoid overfitting, and keep adding new real failures.

Can you answer it under time pressure?

Take a timed medium round and get scored on every answer.

Start mock interview

More medium Prompt Engineer questions