medium10 pts · first answer countsinternal-controlscontrol-testing

The reviewer was on leave

In March, the monthly payroll review was not signed because the reviewer was on leave and no backup had been named. How should this be treated?

A.As a deviation, and the lack of a backup reviewer is a design gap to fixB.As acceptable, because leave is a valid reason for a missed reviewC.As not tested, so March is simply removed from the sampleD.As effective, if the reviewer signs the March report on return

Discussion 0

Join free to post in the discussion.

The reviewer was on leave

Discussion 0

Related questions