Skip to content
RED SAGSkills
hardAI Engineer (LLM & Generative AI) interview question

An agent that completes multi-step tasks works in demos but fails often in production. How do you make it reliable?

What the interviewer wants to hear

  • Prefer simple workflows; use agents only where needed
  • Tracing to find failure steps
  • Better tools, clearer instructions, structured state
  • Budgets, retries, checkpoints, human-in-the-loop
  • Task-level evals with realistic scenarios

Model answer

First I add tracing so I can see each step: the prompt, the tool calls, the results and where it went wrong. Usually failures cluster: wrong tool choice, bad arguments, confusing tool output, or losing track of the goal. Then I simplify. Many tasks do not need a free-form agent; a fixed workflow with LLM steps at specific points is more predictable, so I only keep autonomy where it adds value. I improve tool descriptions and errors, keep explicit state like a task plan or checklist, and validate each step output. I add hard limits on steps, tokens and time, retries for transient tool errors, and checkpoints so long tasks can resume. Risky actions get human approval. Finally I build task-level evals from real production failures and measure success rate, cost and steps per task on every change.

Can you answer it under time pressure?

Take a timed hard round and get scored on every answer.

Start mock interview

More hard AI Engineer (LLM & Generative AI) questions